Only 7 Verdicts in Nearly 2 Years: MP and July Martyr’s Mother Question Justice Delay
Slow Progress in Legal Accountability for 2024 Uprising Sparks Concern
Only 7 verdicts in nearly 2 years – The delay in delivering justice for the victims of the July 2024 uprising has drawn sharp criticism, with MP Rokeya Begum and the mother of a martyr demanding faster action. During a recent parliamentary session, Begum highlighted the pace of verdicts, stating that only seven convictions have been handed down in nearly two years, despite over 80 cases being filed by the International Crimes Tribunal. This slow progress has raised questions about the efficiency of the justice system and the commitment of authorities to hold perpetrators accountable.
Personal Loss and Political Call for Accountability
“On August 5, my son Jabir Ibrahim was shot and fell as a martyr after losing a significant amount of blood. When I saw him, his face was pale, and his body had no remaining blood—it had been spilled on this land,” she recounted.
Begum’s emotional plea echoes the grief of many families affected by the violence. She emphasized that the parliament itself was built on the blood of martyrs and the cries of the injured, urging the government to prioritize justice. “Every parent desires justice for their child’s death,” she stated. “We need the government to ensure accountability for every life lost during the July mass uprising.” Her words underscore the deep connection between the political institution and the sacrifices of the people.
International Crimes Tribunal’s Case Load and Verdict Delays
While the International Crimes Tribunal has processed 80 cases linked to the 2024 uprising, Begum pointed out that only seven verdicts have been issued in nearly two years. This stark contrast has fueled criticism of the judicial process, with 22 cases still in testimony and 51 under investigation. “This slow pace shows the system is not functioning efficiently,” she added, stressing the urgency for a faster resolution to restore public trust.
The tribunal’s workload, which includes crimes against humanity and state-sponsored violence, has been a focal point of debate. Critics argue that the sheer volume of cases, combined with bureaucratic delays, has stalled progress. Begum’s concerns align with broader calls for transparency and expedited trials, as the delayed verdicts risk eroding the legacy of the uprising and perpetuating impunity for those responsible.
Martyr Recognition and Support for Survivors
Begum also raised the issue of martyr recognition, noting that over 1,000 individuals were killed in the July 2024 uprising but only 834 have received official gazetted status. Another 50 martyrs remain unlisted, raising concerns about the classification of victims. She argued that proper recognition is vital for preserving the memory of the July fighters and ensuring their families receive adequate support.
“July fighters who lost limbs are suffering because they are not categorized correctly and lack proper support,” she said. “How can a fighter who lost his hand remain in the ‘G’ category? I demand a thorough review of their classification.”
Survivors, including those with severe injuries, face additional challenges. Begum stressed the need for resources to support both the physical and emotional needs of the affected families. The lack of timely recognition and assistance has been seen as a failure to honor the sacrifices made during the uprising, further complicating efforts to achieve justice.
Foundation’s Role and Funding Challenges
The July Martyrs’ Memorial Foundation has been a key player in supporting families of the victims, providing financial aid, medical care, and mental health services. However, Begum noted that the foundation’s staff have not received salaries or Eid bonuses in the past three months, threatening its ability to continue operations. “We have distributed Tk 120 crore to martyrs and injured participants, but the foundation is struggling to sustain itself,” she said, calling for increased government funding.
This financial strain highlights the broader challenges facing organizations dedicated to justice and remembrance. Without consistent support, the foundation risks becoming overwhelmed, leaving many families without the necessary assistance. Begum’s remarks underscore the importance of institutional backing in ensuring that the aftermath of the uprising is managed effectively.
Political Safeguards and Threats to Historical Memory
Begum also warned of efforts by “fugitive fascist forces” to erase the memory of the July 2024 uprising. She cited incidents of memorials being burned and threats issued against survivors, emphasizing the need for stronger political safeguards. While legal protections have been granted to July fighters, she argued that these measures are not sufficient to prevent ongoing intimidation and attacks on the movement’s legacy.
The MP called for a clear directive from the law minister to address these threats, stating that the pace of justice is directly linked to the preservation of historical memory. “If we do not act swiftly, the story of the July martyrs will be forgotten,” she warned. Her comments reflect growing anxiety about the political dynamics shaping the aftermath of the uprising and the future of its recognition.
Government Response and Continued Advocacy
Law Minister Md Asaduzzaman responded under Rule 300, acknowledging the emotional weight of Begum’s speech. “The speech reflects the spirit of our revolution, our struggle, and the sacrifices of our people,” he said. He framed legal protections as part of a broader political framework, asserting that every law was a political tool and a form of public policy.
Asaduzzaman’s response, while supportive, did not fully address the criticisms of verdict delays. Begum and other advocates continue to push for concrete action, urging the government to prioritize justice over political considerations. The ongoing debate underscores the complex interplay between legal processes and political will in addressing the aftermath of the July 2024 uprising.
